Both Gauland and von Storch are prominent figures in the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, known for their controversial statements and right-wing views. Gauland is one of the party's co-founders and has been a key figure in shaping its anti-immigration and nationalist agenda. Von Storch, on the other hand, is known for her staunch Euroscepticism and anti-Islam stance. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on one's specific political priorities and values. **

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions. Both Beatrix von Storch and Björn Höcke are members of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has been associated with controversial and far-right views. It is important to critically evaluate the policies and statements of any political figure before forming an opinion. **

Beatrix von Storch ended up insulting someone by making a controversial statement on social media or in public. She is known for her outspoken and often divisive opinions on political and social issues, which can lead to her making remarks that offend others. Whether it's through a tweet, interview, or public speech, von Storch's comments have sparked controversy and backlash, leading to her insulting someone in the process. **

Lauterbach reported Beatrix von Storch because she made a controversial statement on social media that he believed incited hatred and violence. Von Storch had suggested that the police should be allowed to use firearms against women and children at the border to prevent them from entering Germany illegally. Lauterbach felt that her comments were dangerous and inflammatory, prompting him to report her to the authorities. **

Von Storch does not actually want to sue the sun. This statement is a metaphor used by Hans von Storch, a prominent climate scientist, to emphasize the need for action on climate change. He is highlighting the fact that while we cannot control the sun, we can take action to mitigate the effects of human-induced climate change. By using this metaphor, von Storch is emphasizing the urgency of addressing climate change and the need for human intervention to protect the planet. **

The German phrase "Es gibt einen Wettlauf zwischen Storch und Pflug" translates to "There is a race between stork and plow" in English. This phrase is used to describe a situation where two opposing forces or entities are in competition with each other, often with the implication that the outcome is uncertain or unpredictable. It can also be used to convey the idea of a race between nature and human intervention, with the stork representing nature and the plow representing human activity. **

The saying "Da brat mir aber einer einen Storch" is a German expression that roughly translates to "Well, if that doesn't beat all!" or "I'll be darned!" It is believed to have originated from a time when storks were considered to bring good luck and were protected by superstition. Therefore, the idea of someone roasting a stork was seen as absurd and surprising, leading to the creation of this saying to express astonishment or disbelief. **

The preference for hosiery varies among women, but generally, stockings are considered more elegant and sexy, while nylon tights are seen as more practical and versatile. Stockings are often chosen for special occasions or to add a touch of glamour to an outfit, while nylon tights are favored for everyday wear due to their warmth and coverage. Ultimately, the choice between stockings and nylon tights depends on the individual's personal style and the specific occasion. **